Sonia Sotomayor: “This is not the first time the Court closes its eyes to noncompliance, nor, I fear, will it be the last.”

It also corrodes the rule of law by rewarding Alabama’s gamesmanship and outright defiance of court orders.

The reason the district court found intentional discrimination even after affording such deference to the Alabama Legislature is simple: The record is crystal clear.

The President can’t restructure federal agencies inconsistently with congressional mandates.

This Court has previously recognized that immigration statutes and procedures should not be construed to ‘create a perverse incentive to enter at an unlawful rather than a lawful location. Yet, the majority’s construction does exactly that.