On the recordJuly 3, 2026
The majority ignores that 'arrival' and 'arriving' in the immigration context have never focused on the precise location of a noncitizen’s feet.
Source
newyorker.comThe majority ignores that 'arrival' and 'arriving' in the immigration context have never focused on the precise location of a noncitizen’s feet.
Dissenting in a Supreme Court ruling on immigration.
Share
More from Sonia Sotomayor
Because of the Court’s decision today, West Virginia, and any other state actor, can deny B. P. J. and others like her these experiences simply because it thinks they have an inherent athletic advantage, even if the facts show that they do…
In the end, to the Court, the facts do not matter, even though the consequences are serious.