In addition to being wrong on the merits, the Court’s decision inflicts two grave harms on the public.

You want to say tariffs are not taxes, but that’s exactly what they are. They are generating money from American citizens.

It hands the Executive the power to repeal statutes by firing all those necessary to carry them out.

Congress created the Department, and only Congress can abolish it.

Equity does not support such an inequitable result.

Because I cannot condone such abuse of our equitable authority, I respectfully dissent.

The majority apparently deems it more important to free the Government from paying employees it had no right to fire than to avert these very real harms while the litigation continues.

When the Executive publicly announces its intent to break the law, and then executes on that promise, it is the Judiciary's duty to check that lawlessness, not expedite it.

The President must take care that the laws are faithfully executed, not set out to dismantle them.

Disability discrimination is 'most often the product, not of invidious animus, but rather of thoughtlessness and indifference—of benign neglect.'

public schools offer to children of all faiths and backgrounds an education and an opportunity to practice living in our multicultural society.

if we can opt out of even 'subtle' messages, chaos will reign and student learning will suffer.

at once the symbol of our democracy and the most pervasive means for promoting our common destiny.

Students with disabilities face daunting challenges on a daily basis and those challenges do not include having to satisfy a more stringent standard of proof.

The President can’t restructure federal agencies inconsistently with congressional mandates.

excuses (once again) the government’s undisguised contempt for the judiciary.

I agree with Justice Jackson that the president cannot restructure federal agencies in a manner inconsistent with congressional mandates.

the Supreme Court on speed dial.

What the government wants to do, concretely, is send the eight noncitizens it illegally removed from the United States from Djibouti to South Sudan, where they will be turned over to the local authorities without regard for the likelihood…

Today’s order clarifies only one thing: Other litigants must follow the rules, but the administration has the Supreme Court on speed dial.

What the Government wants to do, concretely, is send the eight noncitizens it illegally removed from the United States from Djibouti to South Sudan, where they will be turned over to the local authorities without regard for the likelihood…

No right is safe in the new legal regime the Court creates.

strips federal courts of the ability to safeguard constitutional rights in the face of nationwide executive overreach.

The damage to America’s public education system will be profound.

No right is safe in a regime where courts cannot fully protect those before them.