I once again urge my colleagues to support this bipartisan legislation. Let me emphasize the bipartisan nature of it. Bill Pascrell has been there from the start. He referenced the anthrax attacks here in the Capitol back in 2001. None of…
Peter King
The Public Record
Peter King is a former Republican member of the United States House of Representatives, representing New York's 2nd congressional district from 1993 to 2021. During his tenure, he was known for his work on issues related to national security, particularly in the aftermath of the September 11 attacks, and served as chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee. King was also involved in various legislative efforts concerning veterans' affairs and infrastructure development in his district. He announced his retirement from Congress in 2020, concluding nearly three decades of service in the House.
I have no further speakers, and I reserve the balance of my time. Miss RICE of New York. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume. Mr. Speaker, H.R. 2206 will protect the progress we have made toward achieving nationwide…
I have continued to encourage the Federal Reserve, both publicly and privately, to adopt a rules-based approach to monetary policy and communicate that rule to the public.
No way should we be minimizing. In fact, we should probably even be increasing the threat of Islamic--countering the threat of Islamic terrorism.
There seems to be no real answer here. Because we do have some moral and diplomatic obligation to take some refugees in.
But we have also had refugees and asylum seekers who take advantage of U.S. safe haven to plot and carry out attacks.
I think we have raised issues today that there are no, in no way any definitive answers for.
I know that the Federal Law Enforcement Officers Association, FLEOA, Fraternal Order of Police strongly supported it.
But I would say the one concern I would have is if people became aware we were primarily taking Syrian refugees from Jordan, there would be an incentive by groups to get their terrorists through Jordan at that point.
The U.S. refugee program can offer them that safety and still protect the United States from possible threats.
We cannot allow that to happen. I hope the White House will do more to convince Congress and the American people that it is moving forward cautiously, appropriately, but most importantly with the security of the American people as a…
For Americans, opening our doors to those who flee violence, war, and exploitation is part of who we are as a Nation.
The United States has seen the danger of flawed refugee vetting, as well as the potential for refugees to be radicalized once they are in the United States.
I don't know of any closer ally we have in the world than Jordan, I mean, at every level of cooperation of Jordan is first class, of Jordanians is first class.
I remind you that members of al-Qaeda in Iraq, the predecessor to ISIS, have already managed to sneak in to our country through refugee settlement programs.
I believe Chairman Fitzpatrick was a cosponsor, and the ranking member of the full committee, Ms. Waters, was a cosponsor.
For Americans opening our doors to those who flee violence or exploitation, this is part of who we are as a Nation.
That would just require companies with fewer than 20 employees and/or less than $5 million in revenue to file information with Treasury disclosing beneficial ownership.
We have to show we are doing something. Otherwise King Abdullah could be losing some of his support in Jordan.
This doesn't mean that we should close our borders and not accept anyone, but we certainly need to be thoughtful and deliberative about the process.
I fully agree with the last point you made, that we have not done enough for those who, especially in Afghanistan, the translators who are going to be left behind.
Now, why should hardworking taxpayers' dollars be used to bail out other countries, especially after suffering from bailout fatigue in our own backyard?
the fact is this is as effective as any program I have seen since all the time I have been in Congress, and it provides a need which is a lasting need.
I strongly support the James Zadroga 9/11 Health and Compensation Reauthorization Act because it will provide that important certainty and continuity of care from this point forward.
I would just like to say that there is probably no more important bill that we have passed during the time, you know, that I have been in Congress than this 9/11 Zadroga Act.





