I share that concern. Like so much of what we have seen from this administration, this budget would put the climate, our air, our drinking water, our land, our communities, and our...
This budget proposal simply does not allow the EPA to fulfill its mission to the American people, and therefore it is a proposal that we mus...
I believe many of us are concerned that EPA is not acting urgently or comprehensively enough to address serious risks to Americans' drinking...
I am extremely concerned by the political leadership's continued treatment of scientific expertise within the agency and outside advisors.
If enacted, I fear this funding level will jeopardize the Agency's ability to fulfill its mission of protecting Americans' health and our en...
It is imperative that this transition is fair to impacted workers and communities. We cannot leave anyone behind.
The science is clear--we need to transition our economy to becoming carbon neutral as soon as possible.
We can either do a relief for those most wealthy and bloat our deficit or we can prioritize our children and their health.
But I must point out inaccuracies in the document. In the release, the EPA claims that my colleagues and I deliberately chose to exclude the...
The EPA established the lead action level in 1991 based on feasibility and not based on impact on public health.
The area of safe drinking water, which obviously is a fundamental right and a fundamental duty of our federal government, is our focus here ...