Despite the overwhelming science showing that climate change poses a real threat to our communities, the majority in the Senate continues to oppose doing anything meaningful to stop climate change or to reduce our carbon emissions.
Kirsten Gillibrand
The Public Record
Kirsten Elizabeth Gillibrand is a United States Senator from New York, serving since January 26, 2009. A member of the Democratic Party, she has been a prominent advocate for women's rights, healthcare reform, and environmental issues. Throughout her tenure, Gillibrand has focused on legislation aimed at improving the lives of families and promoting equality in various sectors. She has also been vocal on issues related to national security and veterans' affairs.
That storm came just a year after two other devastating storms, Hurricane Irene and Tropical Storm Lee, which also ravaged the Northeast.
Obviously climate change is real, it is here, and humans have a very significant role to play in it.
We have a fundamental responsibility in this committee to protect our communities from the harm caused by human made climate change.
I rise to strongly oppose this cynical and opportunistic ploy to fulfill a longtime ideological goal to defund Planned Parenthood. Let's talk facts, not rhetoric. The fact is no Federal funds can be used for an abortion. No Federal funds…
What happens if we reject the deal? Specifically, I'd like a little more thought on, What do you think Iran will do when America rejects the deal?
the consequences would be "catastrophic" if Congress were to reject the agreement.
I am working extensively with my Senate colleagues to ensure students are protected from incidents of sexual violence and perpetrators are held accountable.
SUNY has been privileged to work with Senator Gillibrand, her colleagues in the Senate, and members of the New York Delegation.
Legislation like the bill proposed by Senators McCaskill and Gillibrand will ensure that colleges and universities are held accountable in these areas.
given the violent felony that this actually is, we need to bring law enforcement in at an earlier time
Secretary Moniz, does this initial period potentially extend the time for access significantly beyond 24 days from the time a suspicious site is identified by the IAEA and the concern is communicated to Iran?
Finally, we want to bring this crime out from the shadows and make it a priority on our Nation's campuses.
I'm so grateful for your attention to this issue and your commitment to this issue.
We strongly support Senator Kirsten Gillibrand and your colleagues' efforts to make this issue a national priority.
Colleges and universities would be required to designate confidential advisors to these students.
We listened to law enforcement, we talked to campus officials, we talked to the advocates for the rights of the accused, all who wanted their voices heard.
We've heard a lot of concerns about the fact that this deal did not address Iran's bad behavior in the region.
Secretary Moniz, according to Dr. Olli Heinonen, former Deputy Director of the IAEA, Iran could theoretically sanitize a suspected site of materials--including nuclear materials--within 2 weeks and has done so in the past. Do you agree…
I find it highly implausible that, if we reject the deal now... the idea that they would come back to that... is unlikely.
Secretary Moniz, this agreement begins with a significant roll back of Iran's capabilities and levels of inspection that include access to known facilities, limitations on the number of centrifuges they can have spinning, the 24-day access…





