Mark Amodei

I know there is some concern about some of the amounts of wilderness and stuff that is being removed from oil and gas exploration.

It should be noted, though, when you talk about place-based decisions, we don't write lands bills in my office for my district.

I appreciate hearing the references from both of you about decisions made closest to the ground are best, and placed-based decisions regarding Federal land use.

Their combined advocacy for this measure not only highlights the importance critical minerals play in our clean energy future, but also a substantial number of jobs across the United States attributable to responsible mining companies.

The legislation returns to the workable framework that existed prior to the fundamentally flawed Rosemont ruling.

H.R. 2925, introduced by Nevada Congressman Mark Amodei, and co-sponsored by Congresswoman Mary Peltola, would resolve severe permitting uncertainty.

It is interesting to hear how the Mining Law of 1872, which anybody that can add goes, that is a long time, maybe we ought to update that.

That decision, which was applied to the Forest Service, basically overturned multiple decades, nearly a half a century of what was recognized in terms of what it did to pursue a mining claim.

The Air Force supports Representative Amodei's bill, which mirrors the Administration's Fiscal Year 2024 NDAA proposal.

H.R. 6070 is a technical amendment to the Military Lands Withdrawal Act of 1999.

Reclaiming my time. With all due respect, the definition of a CR is you go forward. There is nothing to block in going forward with last year's language. That language still applies. Thank you, good morning, and God bless America. Ms…

As the chairman of the Legislative Branch Subcommittee in the Appropriations Committee which has very specific jurisdiction over Member pay, I want to say plainly and unambiguously, in the 70 pages in this thing, directly or indirectly…

The request made by the county to be a cooperating agency was a very reasonable request, and its denial was patently unreasonable.

NASA denied the request made in the letter and again denied the county's subsequent requests made in public meetings.

There is no evidence that anything has changed that requires NASA to now withdraw the land.

The question as to whether you have valid, existing rights is also one that is a little bit nebulous to us

So, that is why we have this bill. That is why we brought it to say this is about, hey, can they have a chance to try to go through the recognized, transparent due process of NEPA?

We don't want your input, we don't want you to be a cooperating agency.

Hey, please, please make Nye County a cooperating agency for NEPA purposes.

Hey, NASA, come on, it is the county where it is located. They ought to be able to have a say.

NEPA is a good thing, because it provides due process and transparency in decisions we make about resources and land use.

H.R. 3883 is not about somebody should have said yes or anything else like that. It is about hypocrisy.

I want a field demonstration. How are you tracking satellites in Railroad Valley?

Thank you for your input, Nevada Delegation, Republicans, Democrats, both Houses of the Congress. No.

I won't go into whether the Utah thing was unprovoked, although I do find it interesting that somebody from the Beehive State is talking about contraception.