On the recordJanuary 30, 2024
The legislation returns to the workable framework that existed prior to the fundamentally flawed Rosemont ruling.
Source
congress.govEditor's note · Context
Mark Amodei emphasizes the need for clarity in mining regulations after the Rosemont decision.
Share
More from Mark Amodei
Mar 6, 2024
It should be noted, though, when you talk about place-based decisions, we don't write lands bills in my office for my district.
Mar 6, 2024
There is a failure to distinguish between... what affects the Bureau of Land Management in this bill.
Aug 25, 2026
Pocket rescissions would be a very interesting way to curry favor with the legislative branch — especially the one part of the legislative branch which has delivered on all of the administration’s shit.
Jan 30, 2024
It is interesting to hear how the Mining Law of 1872, which anybody that can add goes, that is a long time, maybe we ought to update that.
Other voices in this conversation
