Would it be the truth in regard to these nominees, in regard to Owens and Kuhl and Pickering and Estrada, who we haven't talked about, that in each and every case the measures of their competence, be it the bar association, the gold standard my colleagues across the aisle have talked about for so long, be it the recommendations of their colleagues, other judges with whom they have worked, be it the recommendations of the voters when they put themselves up for a vote--in each and every case, they received the highest recommendation; that is the truth, is it not?
Watson Coleman: “Would it be the truth in regard to these nominees, in regard to Owens and Kuhl and Pickering and Estrada, who we haven't…”
On the recordNovember 12, 2003
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the qualifications of judicial nominees during a floor speech.
Share
More from Watson Coleman
Jun 13, 2016
I really don't know where to begin here because the picture that seems to be painted from the discussion and from the questions and answers is that this is a dysfunctional organization with very little accountability and not very good…
May 9, 2022
I have seen the value of neighborhood preservation programs where you go into a neighborhood that is kind of declining, you have got nice homes and then you have got a few homes that are in real trouble, and you apply those resources to…
May 3, 2021
I strongly support this legislation. I co-sponsored it last Congress and look forward to having an opportunity to move it forward this Congress.





