I would say we are a responsive office, as is your office, to the constituents' needs in our district. So, no. That is why the statement released by the Speaker on this is difficult to comprehend.
Scott Garrett: “I would say we are a responsive office, as is your office, to the constituents' needs in our district. So, no. That is…”
Editor's note · Context
Responding to a statement made by the Speaker regarding constituent services.
Share
More from Scott Garrett
In June of this year, after 81 years of doling out taxpayer-funded welfare for mega-corporations, the American people said enough and Congress let the Export-Import Bank expire. Yet today, through a little-known and little-used legislative…
Accurate and transparent financial statements are absolutely critical to maintaining investor confidence in our markets.
Ex-Im has transformed the role of Government from a disinterested referee that guarantees a free and open marketplace into a biased actor that tilts the scales in favor of its friends and businesses.
Do you see a need to benefit the Goldman Sachs CEOs of the world and pay them more than the small, local banks on Main Street where my constituents have to invest their money?





