I would say we are a responsive office, as is your office, to the constituents' needs in our district. So, no. That is why the statement released by the Speaker on this is difficult to comprehend.
Scott Garrett: “I would say we are a responsive office, as is your office, to the constituents' needs in our district. So, no. That is…”
Editor's note · Context
Responding to a statement made by the Speaker regarding constituent services.
Share
More from Scott Garrett
I find it difficult to believe that the SEC will know where to draw the line better than each individual investor.
I agree with the testimony of Professor Coffee that this committee seems to be rushing from the first Jobs Act to kind of a 'Jobs Act II,' without fully understanding the consequences of the first law.
You lamented the problem, but failed to admit to acknowledge in your comments that it is your actions and the Fed and the government policies that can have a dramatic impact on expansion of the gap between rich and the poor.
Yes, we have the opportunity today to save capitalism from cronyism. Yes, we have the opportunity to protect the American taxpayer and the American Dream and to preserve free enterprise.





