And I am not naive in my politics or on economics at all. Because we know that, in business, at the end of the day the cost of anything that we buy is eventually paid for by whom? By the consumer. You can say that you are pushing it off onto the stockholders or the investors of the company, but at that point in time you realize that if it raises the price too much for the stockholders or investors to invest in that company, what will they do? They will step back and they will not invest in that entity anymore, they will not invest in that company anymore, which raises the overall cost for investment for that entity. In this situation, then where does the cost go to? It goes to the consumer. Mr. Chairman, we should be opposed to this mortgage tax increase.
Scott Garrett: “And I am not naive in my politics or on economics at all. Because we know that, in business, at the end of the day the…”
Editor's note · Context
Opposing a mortgage tax increase during a congressional debate.
Share
More from Scott Garrett
Do you see a need to benefit the Goldman Sachs CEOs of the world and pay them more than the small, local banks on Main Street where my constituents have to invest their money?
Ex-Im has transformed the role of Government from a disinterested referee that guarantees a free and open marketplace into a biased actor that tilts the scales in favor of its friends and businesses.
In June of this year, after 81 years of doling out taxpayer-funded welfare for mega-corporations, the American people said enough and Congress let the Export-Import Bank expire. Yet today, through a little-known and little-used legislative…
The Export-Import Bank transformed the role of Government from a disinterested referee in the economy into a biased actor that uses your taxpayer dollars to tilt the scales in favor of its friends.





