What happened was the Rules Committee decided to not allow the amendment to come to the floor. So at the end of the day, we have a bill where the rich are still being subsidized by the poor. Substance was altered by the stifling of debate. I will commend the chairman of the committee for all he did and by not voting ``yes'' on the rule because even he, a Democrat chairman, saw the error of their ways in what they did.
Discussing the impact of the Rules Committee's decision on a bill.
Share
More from Scott Garrett
You lamented the problem, but failed to admit to acknowledge in your comments that it is your actions and the Fed and the government policies that can have a dramatic impact on expansion of the gap between rich and the poor.
It is hard to imagine anything more unfair and un-American than having the Government financially support mega-corporations at the expense of small businesses and American workers.
But why would we want to extend the taxpayer subsidy and bailout safety net to capital markets and asset management?
Other voices in this conversation
