I want to associate my remarks with my ranking member, Mr. Lewis. Following the time-honored tradition of our Defense Appropriations Subcommittee, Chairman Dicks and Mr. Young have put together, in a collegial manner, a solid product. The funding for defense operations and maintenance, for the Afghan and Iraq Security Forces, for Army base operations, M-RAPs, National Guard and Reserve equipment, and the other portions of the defense and of the military construction portion of the bill are worthy of our support. If that's where the story ended, we would be fine, but as Ronald Reagan famously said, 'There they go again.' This legislation contains over $72 billion in discretionary and mandatory spending. Less than half of that total, $35 billion, is related to the ongoing fight against the Taliban and al Qaeda in Afghanistan or our withdrawal from Iraq and the State Department funding related to the war on terror. The rest is earmarked for nondefense programs, new bailouts, and pet projects to benefit the majority's political allies.
Rodney Frelinghuysen: “I want to associate my remarks with my ranking member, Mr. Lewis. Following the time-honored tradition of our Defense…”
Editor's note · Context
The speaker addresses concerns about excessive spending in a defense appropriations bill.
Share
More from Rodney Frelinghuysen
This amendment would provide funding to re-create a government agency, as the gentleman mentioned, which was defunded in 1995, 23 years ago. Before we re-create an entire government agency, I believe the most responsible thing to do is to…
On rollcall 374, I am not recorded. Had I been present, I would have voted ``yea'' on rollcall No. 374. personal explanation
I would be very pleased to accept the amendment. I thank the gentleman from Tennessee for his forethought and concern, which we also share.
Woman, I yield 2 minutes to the gentleman from California (Mr. Calvert), the chairman of the Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies Subcommittee, for the purpose of a colloquy.





