Despite the extraordinary funding for Land and Water Conservation projects, there will continue to be an annual need to address ongoing acquisitions within Federal units. In fiscal year 1999 the administration requested $270 million, which is in line with regular funding levels in recent years, but the House bill was unable to achieve this level this year. I realize the chairman of the subcommittee has worked on under strict budgetary constraints and in fact received a lower 302(b) allocation than last year. However, it is my fervent hope that the conferees from this body can work to arrive at a final Land and Water Conservation level that is at least consistent with the Senate's appropriation. Is it the gentleman's intention to move in this direction?
Rodney Frelinghuysen: “Despite the extraordinary funding for Land and Water Conservation projects, there will continue to be an annual need to…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing funding for Land and Water Conservation projects during a House floor debate.
Share
More from Rodney Frelinghuysen
I send to the desk a concurrent resolution providing for a correction in the enrollment of H.R. 1625, and I ask unanimous consent for its immediate consideration in the House. The Clerk read the title of the concurrent resolution. The…
The GAO does most of what these gentlemen are seeking. I think, obviously, they have a certain feeling, and I respect those feelings. I don't think we need to create an agency, basically the duties of which have been taken, for the last 23…
This amendment would provide funding to re-create a government agency, as the gentleman mentioned, which was defunded in 1995, 23 years ago. Before we re-create an entire government agency, I believe the most responsible thing to do is to…





