I make a point of order against the amendment because it proposes to change existing law and constitutes legislation on an appropriation bill; therefore it violates clause 2 of rule XXI. The rule states in pertinent part: ``An amendment to a general appropriation bill shall not be in order if changing existing law.'' This amendment proposes to state a legislative position, and I ask for a ruling from the Chair. The Acting CHAIR. Does any other Member wish to be heard? The gentleman from Iowa.
Rodney Frelinghuysen: “I make a point of order against the amendment because it proposes to change existing law and constitutes legislation on…”
On the recordJuly 6, 2011
Share
More from Rodney Frelinghuysen
Jun 8, 2018
With all due respect to the minority leader, the process has been collaborative, Republicans and Democrats. These are the three bills that have historically received both Republican and Democratic support. They embody American values. What…
Sep 26, 2018
I am pleased to yield 3 minutes to the gentleman from Kentucky (Mr. Rogers), chairman of the State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Subcommittee, my predecessor.
Sep 26, 2018
I am pleased to yield 2 minutes to the gentleman from Oklahoma (Mr. Cole), chairman of the Labor, Health and Human Services, Education and Related Agencies Subcommittee on Appropriations.





