I oppose the amendment of the gentleman from Georgia. His amendment would cut $158 million from the Office of Science within the Department of Energy in favor of deficit savings. I should say for the record we cut approximately $220 million from last year's number. So we've substantially reduced this account. Let me just say, too, that the basic science program within the Department conducts research with a staggering potential for benefits for our Nation. Cutting the program further, which is what he seeks, threatens our long-term energy security, hurts American scientists and industry, and I think to some extent blemishes our credibility as a worldwide leader in basic science programs. I therefore oppose this amendment, urge others to do likewise, and I yield back the balance of my time.
Rodney Frelinghuysen: “I oppose the amendment of the gentleman from Georgia. His amendment would cut $158 million from the Office of Science…”
On the recordJuly 9, 2013
Share
More from Rodney Frelinghuysen
Dec 20, 2018
I urge Members to vote ``yes'' on the bill, to keep the government open until February 8, to support critical border security, which is badly needed, and to look after the needs of so many Americans who have suffered from so many disasters…
Jul 17, 2018
Woman, I yield 2 minutes to the gentleman from California (Mr. Calvert), the chairman of the Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies Subcommittee, for the purpose of a colloquy.
Jun 7, 2018
I would be very pleased to accept the amendment. I thank the gentleman from Tennessee for his forethought and concern, which we also share.
Jul 17, 2018
I am pleased to yield 3 minutes to the gentleman from West Virginia (Mr. Jenkins), a member of the committee.





