Political Quotes

On the recordFebruary 18, 2011
I join with the ranking member in opposing this amendment. The current allocation for defense is already $14.8 billion below the fiscal year 2011 request, an almost 3 percent reduction; and of course our committee wants to help to address the Federal deficit, too, as do other committees. Further, arbitrary reductions, especially of this magnitude of over $23.5 billion, will basically bring the Department of Defense to a grinding halt, perhaps one beyond what is reasonable. Specifically, the amendment would require reducing and canceling training for returning troops; canceling Navy training exercises; reducing Air Force flight training; delaying or canceling the maintenance of aircraft, ships or vehicles; delaying important safety and quality-of-life repairs to facilities and military barracks. At a time of war, we should be showing support for our troops and not undercutting them, even though for good reasons, in order to lower the Federal deficit by making reductions of this amount.
Said by
Rodney Frelinghuysen
New Jersey

Editor's note · Context

The speaker opposes an amendment that would significantly cut defense funding.

Share

More from Rodney Frelinghuysen

Dec 20, 2018

I am pleased to yield 2 minutes to the gentleman from Georgia (Mr. Carter).

govinfo.gov
Dec 20, 2018

I am pleased to yield 2 minutes to the gentleman from Ohio (Mr. Wenstrup).

govinfo.gov
Sep 26, 2018

I thank the gentleman from Pennsylvania for yielding. Mr. Speaker, I rise in support of H.R. 302. Hurricane Florence struck North and South Carolina last week, leading to the loss of many lives and incredible hardship for thousands of…

govinfo.gov
Sep 26, 2018

I am pleased to yield 2 minutes to the gentleman from California (Mr. Calvert), the chairman of the Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies Subcommittee on Appropriations.

govinfo.gov

Other voices in this conversation