Rodney Frelinghuysen said "I make a point of order against the amendment because it proposes to change existing law and constitutes legislation in an appropriation bill and therefore violates clause 2 of Rule XXI. The rule states in pertinent part an amendment to a general appropriation bill shall not be in order if changing existing law. The amendment proposes to state a legislative position. I ask for a ruling of the Chair. The Acting CHAIR. Does any Member wish to be heard on the point of order? If not, the Chair is prepared to rule. The amendment offered by the gentleman from North Carolina proposes to state a legislative position of the House. As such, the amendment constitutes legislation in violation of clause 2 of Rule XXI. The point of order is sustained, and the amendment is not in order. Amendment No. 20 Offered by Mr. Kelly of Pennsylvania" @ PoliticalQuotes.com

On the recordJuly 10, 2013

I make a point of order against the amendment because it proposes to change existing law and constitutes legislation in an appropriation bill and therefore violates clause 2 of Rule XXI. The rule states in pertinent part an amendment to a general appropriation bill shall not be in order if changing existing law. The amendment proposes to state a legislative position. I ask for a ruling of the Chair. The Acting CHAIR. Does any Member wish to be heard on the point of order? If not, the Chair is prepared to rule. The amendment offered by the gentleman from North Carolina proposes to state a legislative position of the House. As such, the amendment constitutes legislation in violation of clause 2 of Rule XXI. The point of order is sustained, and the amendment is not in order. Amendment No. 20 Offered by Mr. Kelly of Pennsylvania

Said by

Rodney Frelinghuysen

New Jersey

Source

govinfo.gov

Share on X Share on Facebook Email this quote