I rise to support the Neumann/ Kanjorski amendment to establish a maximum market price for peanut sales of $550 per ton. Mr. Chairman, this amendment attempts to keep our promise to the American people to reform the peanut program, one of a number of inappropriate and outdated subsidies. While last year's Farm Act, better known as the ``Fair Act'' gave farmers of agricultural commodities greatly expanded flexibility, removed the heavy hand of government, and reduced government payments to farmers; the peanut program continues to waste taxpayer's dollars. The sole beneficial peanut provision for consumers in the farm bill-- the 10 percent price reduction, sold to Congress as reform, has been severely undercut by the Department of Agriculture's deliberate reduction in the national marketing quota for peanuts. As implemented, the peanut program completely ignores the needs of consumers for more reasonable peanut prices. Under the current system it is up to the USDA to project what the domestic consumption of peanuts will be and set a marketing quota. In the past the USDA has under estimated the quota creating an artificial shortage of peanuts and thus raising the price. By creating an artificial shortage, USDA has effectively denied the promised reduction in the price of peanuts under the reform provision contained in the farm bill. This amendment follows through with our commitment to reform the peanut program.
Rodney Frelinghuysen: “I rise to support the Neumann/ Kanjorski amendment to establish a maximum market price for peanut sales of $550 per ton.…”
Editor's note · Context
Supporting an amendment to reform the peanut program during House floor debate.
Share
More from Rodney Frelinghuysen
I want to thank the gentlewoman for the time and rise in strong support of her bill, the Defense appropriations bill. I know I join Mrs. Lowey in congratulating Ms. Granger and Mr. Visclosky for their excellent Defense appropriations bill…
I withdraw my reservation of my point of order. The SPEAKER pro tempore. The reservation of a point of order is withdrawn.
This amendment would provide funding to re-create a government agency, as the gentleman mentioned, which was defunded in 1995, 23 years ago. Before we re-create an entire government agency, I believe the most responsible thing to do is to…
I would like to thank the gentleman for his amendment. We are pleased to accept it. This is a remarkable program, and we want to honor those who serve and allow them to serve with us in a further capacity. I wanted to commend the…





