On the recordJuly 9, 2013
I insist on my point of order. The amendment proposes to amend portions of the bill not yet read. The amendment may not be considered en bloc under clause 2(f) of rule XXI because the amendment proposes to increase the level of outlays in the bill: Non-Defense Environmental Cleanup outlays at 65 percent, an increase in outlays of $3,250,000; and nuclear energy outlays at 55 percent, a decrease in outlays of $2,750,000, resulting in a net increase in outlays of $500,000. I ask for a ruling from the Chair at this time. The Acting CHAIR. Does any other Member wish to be heard? If not, the Chair will rule. To be considered en bloc pursuant to clause 2(f) of rule XXI, an amendment must not propose to increase the levels of budget authority or outlays in the bill. Because the amendment offered by the gentlewoman from California proposes a net increase in the level of outlays in the bill--as argued by the chairman of the Subcommittee on Appropriations--it may not avail itself of clause 2(f) to address portions of the bill not yet read. The point of order is sustained. The amendment is not in order.
