This legislation will impose onerous and unnecessary restrictions on the President's ability to place U.S. forces under the operational control of the Nation's military leaders for U.N. operations. Throughout our history, presidents have found it advantageous and prudent for forces to participate in coalition operations. During the Gulf War, Korea, and during 50 years of the NATO alliance and in multilateral peacekeeping operations, our armed forces have successfully worked side by side with those of other nations. Mr. Chairman, this would force the administration to choose between acting unilaterally and doing nothing. Accordingly, we urge rejection of the restrictions on the President's command and control, and his military authority, in this legislation.
Robert Torricelli: “This legislation will impose onerous and unnecessary restrictions on the President's ability to place U.S. forces under…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing a letter from former Joint Chiefs of Staff opposing restrictions on the President's military authority.
Share
More from Robert Torricelli
It would appear that after more than a decade of discussions about campaign finance reform, the House of Representatives and the Senate may be nearer an accord on a historic change of how Federal elections are conducted in the United…
we will always remember where we were on this day, 1 year ago. As on other moments of tragedy in American history, September 11 will forever be in our hearts and mind. For those who were lost, for those who gave of themselves to save…
on October 19, 2000, more than 50 years after the end of World War II, Congress passed the Wartime Violation of Italian American Civil Liberties Act. I am pleased to have been the Senate sponsor of that bill which directed the U.S…
There are moments when we are reminded why our fathers and mothers created this Union. This is one of those moments to provide for the common defense, to promote the general welfare. All of America was attacked, but that attack fell most…





