I assume the gentleman's question was not rhetorical. What we have to fear, we should listen to the advice of attorneys general and Governors and insurance commissioners from around the country who say we have to fear this: we have to fear a poorly regulated or unregulated structure that is not properly accountable under fiduciary standards and has no experience in running insurance companies, which is why they oppose the bill.
Rob Andrews: “I assume the gentleman's question was not rhetorical. What we have to fear, we should listen to the advice of attorneys…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing concerns about regulatory standards in insurance legislation.
Share
More from Rob Andrews
I thank my friend for yielding. With a sense of real mixed emotions, I join this discussion tonight, certainly with gratitude and pride for Barry's 33 years of service but also for a real sense of regret that he will not be a part of our…
On that I demand the yeas and nays. The yeas and nays were ordered. The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to clause 9 of rule XX, the Chair will reduce to 5 minutes the minimum time for any electronic vote on the question of passage. This is a…
And my colleagues, we have listened to the many stories told by people this morning with great empathy about people who got a cancelation notice and want to keep the policy that they have. The issue before the House is whether we want to…





