On the recordFebruary 12, 2013
I think this is a huge constitutional issue. And the reason that I believe that is, is that why wouldn't a president, a Republican or a Democrat, just simply bypass the Senate?
Source
congress.govRob Andrews: “I think this is a huge constitutional issue. And the reason that I believe that is, is that why wouldn't a president, a…”
Editor's note · Context
Andrews questions the implications of presidential power to bypass Senate confirmations.
Share
More from Rob Andrews
Nov 15, 2013
On that I demand the yeas and nays. The yeas and nays were ordered. The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to clause 9 of rule XX, the Chair will reduce to 5 minutes the minimum time for any electronic vote on the question of passage. This is a…
Oct 29, 2013
I thank my friend for yielding. Mr. Speaker, my friend, the chairman from Texas, asked, I think, a couple of very important questions about this amendment, and he really points out why I support it. First, he asked: Where is the proof that…
Oct 28, 2013
the best scenario of the four is the status quo, which is grim. The other three compete in terms of their grimness.
Nov 15, 2013
I respectfully appeal the ruling of the Chair. The SPEAKER pro tempore. The question is, Shall the decision of the Chair stand as the judgment of the House?
Other voices in this conversation
