I am most certainly not in favor of that. I would frankly make up for the lost revenue with a surtax on people making more than a million dollars a year to cover it. Let me ask the gentleman another question. I understand that there are differing views in his party, and frankly ours, as to whether an extension of the cut for middle class families should continue. And I'm not asking him to say it would pass. That's beyond the reach of any Member, even the Speaker. But is the majority prepared to make a commitment to the American people to at least get to vote on it, that it will let the majority work its will and either vote ``yes'' or ``no'' on avoiding this tax increase on middle class Americans?
Rob Andrews: “I am most certainly not in favor of that. I would frankly make up for the lost revenue with a surtax on people making…”
On the recordNovember 30, 2011
Share
More from Rob Andrews
Nov 15, 2013
I thank the gentleman. So the employer rates, which have risen at the slowest rates in the last 5 or 6 years, would once again be subject to the kind of spikes that happen here. Look, I think there is bipartisan agreement in this Chamber…
Jan 7, 2014
On rollcall No. 1, I was unavoidably detained and had I been present, I would have been recorded as ``present.'' ____________________
Nov 12, 2013
I understand this is a conceptual proposal, but we don't legislate concepts; we legislate statutes and they have real impact on real people.
Sep 30, 2013
Reclaiming my time, will the chairman agree that the fair thing to do would be to put the Senate bill on the floor so that each Member could cast an up-or-down vote? I yield to the gentleman.





