In fact, Mr. Swartz, isn't it the understanding of the United States that, if found guilty, the individuals would serve the entirety of their sentences inside of Scotland?

Prostate cancer is a very treatable disease and Mr. Megrahi's cancer should have been treated IN JAIL IN SCOTLAND instead of letting him free to go back to his homeland.

And finally, based upon your review of the medical records that the Scottish Government released, did his physical condition match that of someone with an accurate 3-months prognosis?

Didn't the British accelerate their normalization with Libya at a much faster rate?

What irony it is that this man who took these lives and, without a thought about it, planned carefully, the court decided that this was his idea and his management that brought that airplane down.

this committee and the families of the victims want to understand how and why the decision to release was made.

Based on that statement alone, is there not reasonable suspicion that the United Kingdom's decision to conclude a Prisoner Transfer Agreement that did not explicitly exclude al-Megrahi was based primarily on the U.K.'s concern about its…

This evidence, although circumstantial, is deeply troubling, not just for the families of the Lockerbie victims, but for all Americans and all nations of the world who are committed to bringing terrorists to justice.

If we are ever going to win the fight against terrorism, the rule of law must hold strong.

Our resolute conviction remains that Megrahi should not be a free man and should be serving out the entirety of his sentence in a Scottish prison.

I don't think it takes a rocket scientist to figure it out.

Well, thank you all for your testimony.