So if oil was more important to you than Iran achieving a nuclear weapon, deterrence is all gone, is basically what you are telling me.
But the sanctions that we passed, in essence, got the other countries to join, because they had secondary consequences to them.
I would hope that the administration would challenge that letter that the Iranian Ambassador presumably to the U.N. signed.
I would think, at a minimum, we would absolutely extend, at some point, the sanctions we have in place.
the sanctions that expire next year that Congress passed 99-0, at least in the Senate, and overwhelmingly in the House, that was signed by t...
You cannot have it both ways, Ambassador. Either it is significant or it is insignificant. Which one is it?
The threat of sanctions, even though suspended during performance, but the threat of sanctions, is a significant deterrent toward breach in ...
What happened was just the opposite. We actually forged something that brought Iran to the table.
It would have to be a dramatically different Iran to have any aspiration to be a regional power.
That is far different than 'shall not.'
Iran shall not undertake any activity related to ballistic missiles capable of delivering nuclear weapons.