If the design of this bill is to restore to the city named the privileges permitted by the law of 1880, it seems to be entirely unnecessary.
Grover Cleveland: “If the design of this bill is to restore to the city named the privileges permitted by the law of 1880, it seems to be…”
Editor's note · Context
Veto Message
Share
More from Grover Cleveland
A careful examination of this bill has convinced me that for the reasons given and others not specifically stated its provisions are unnecessarily harsh and oppressive.
In my opinion, it is infinitely more safe to admit a hundred thousand immigrants who, though unable to read and write, seek among us only a home and opportunity to work than to admit one of those unruly agitators and enemies of…
This requirement proceeds upon the assumption that the foreign relatives coming here are in every case, by reason of poverty, liable to become a public charge unless the immigrant is capable of their support.
Though it seems to be clear that the consul-general should have professional aid in such investigation, that matter, together with the selection of the particular persons to act with him, properly devolves upon my successor in office.





