And the FCC would not be able to bring enforcement actions against Internet service providers that did not protect that information?
Frank Pallone
The Public Record
Frank Joseph Pallone is an American politician serving as the U.S. Representative for New Jersey's 6th congressional district since 1993. A member of the Democratic Party, Pallone has been a prominent advocate for health care reform, environmental protection, and consumer rights. He has played a key role in shaping legislation related to public health and climate change, often speaking out against policies he views as detrimental to these areas.
If the bill were enacted, the FCC would not be able to require Internet service providers to protect sensitive customer information?
the question must always be whether legislation puts consumers in a better place than they are today.
Data breaches are a plague on consumers, businesses, and our economy as a whole.
I would like to see this bill improved before it moves further through the legislative process so that all members of the committee can support it.
Do you think there are any drawbacks to having FTC and FCC enforcement? Are you concerned about consumers being confused by having two enforcing agencies?
The question must always be whether legislation puts consumers in a better place than they are today.
I do question the merits of the bill before us today. The bill simply does not strike the right balance.
As you read this bill... would there be any protections for these types of customer info, beyond what is listed as personal information?
Any suggestions for how legislation could ensure that companies are not burdened by duplicative enforcement?
Unfortunately, the draft before us today does not put consumers in a better place.





