I don't know the specifics in terms of each line item. It is a 400-page bill. But I would point out, we have that language in the bill that I read before that specifically says that any suggestion that there be an earmark, even if it is just in a committee report or even suggested by the managers, should be simply ignored by the agencies that are involved. Imagine that, as Democrats in the majority, we are telling the agencies that are controlled by the Republican President, pay no attention to any suggestion of an earmark, do what you think is best. What can be more bipartisan than that? And yet they are saying it is filled with all of these earmarks.
Frank Pallone: “I don't know the specifics in terms of each line item. It is a 400-page bill. But I would point out, we have that…”
On the recordJanuary 30, 2007
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing earmark language in a 400-page bill during a House floor debate.
Share
More from Frank Pallone
Jul 11, 2026
If Delaney Hall cannot be operated in compliance with federal law and the Constitution, GEO Group should not continue to profit from taxpayer dollars and Delaney Hall should be closed.
Aug 23, 2026
This $9.6 million investment helps to put another vessel on the water and takes cars off our overcrowded roads. That is exactly what federal infrastructure dollars should be doing.
Jun 30, 2026
The bipartisan KIDS Act does just that. It is comprehensive legislation that addresses a problem everyone in Congress cares deeply about – keeping kids and teens safe online.





