I want to clarify a section in the statement of the managers accompanying the VA-HUD conference report. The language urges EPA not to spend any funds or require any parties to dredge contaminated sediments until completion of a National Academy of Sciences report on dredging technology. The report may take two years to complete. It is my understanding that the language is not intended to limit EPA's authority during the next two years with respect to dredging contaminated sediments that pose a substantial threat to public health or the environment where EPA has found that dredging is an appropriate response action.
Frank Lautenberg: “I want to clarify a section in the statement of the managers accompanying the VA-HUD conference report. The language…”
Editor's note · Context
Clarifying language regarding EPA's authority on dredging contaminated sediments during a conference report discussion.
Share
More from Frank Lautenberg
Thank you for scheduling this hearing to consider the re-nomination of Dr. Allison Macfarlane to be Chairwoman of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC).
I thank the chairman for making this clarification. I agree completely with my colleagues concerning the need for section 3004. Could the language in section 3004 about inclusion of specific project recommendations and feasibility studies…
Immigration is not a zero sum game. If we attract the best talent in the world to come to America, they will create jobs, not displace them.
Do you consider IRS's current strategy for dealing with identity theft and refund fraud to be adequate? No.





