I oppose the Gramm amendment. The amendment would radically change current budget rules by allowing temporary, unspecified cuts in discretionary programs to pay for permanent tax cuts. That would violate the bipartisan budget agreement and could explode the deficit in the future. This amendment also brings back the discredited Gramm-Rudman system of automatic across-the-board cuts, the system that led to a proliferation of gimmicks and rosy scenarios, and we didn't significantly reduce the deficit until we got rid of it. Madam President, fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on us.
Frank Lautenberg: “I oppose the Gramm amendment. The amendment would radically change current budget rules by allowing temporary…”
On the recordJune 27, 1997
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Opposing the Gramm amendment during Senate floor debate.
Share
More from Frank Lautenberg
May 15, 2013
I thank the chairman for making this clarification. I agree completely with my colleagues concerning the need for section 3004. Could the language in section 3004 about inclusion of specific project recommendations and feasibility studies…
Apr 16, 2013
Some will say now isn't the time to make public investments. Some will say we can't afford it.
Apr 22, 2013
I'm proud to have written the only Federal law on ocean acidification--'The Federal Ocean Acidification Research and Monitoring Act'.
May 7, 2013
Although we have had a complete trade ban on Iran since 1995, a significant loophole existed that allowed the foreign subsidiaries of American companies to do business with Iran.





