On the recordMarch 8, 2010
Under current law, EPA bears the burden of proving that a chemical is unreasonably dangerous before the agency can restrict it to protect public health.
Source
congress.govUnder current law, EPA bears the burden of proving that a chemical is unreasonably dangerous before the agency can restrict it to protect public health.
Lautenberg highlights the heavy burden on EPA to prove chemical dangers.
Share
More from Frank Lautenberg
Consumers care about intrusions into their private lives, not just from hackers or governmental entities, but also from commercial entities.
I believe it is time for this subcommittee and others to give serious thought to the way the IRS is funded.
Republicans in the Congress continue to call for even deeper budget cuts--despite clear evidence that the austerity agenda they have championed has slowed the pace of job growth and needlessly increased the suffering of children, seniors…
Do you think these loopholes in our explosives laws put Americans' safety in danger?