It not only makes the law consistent with the rest of the statutes regarding the qualifications for an attache which should have been done some time ago, I think it also sends a message to that country regarding recent activities insofar as expectations and friendship go. I must tell you how disappointed I am in that country regarding that. But, nevertheless, this does bring in line the law as it applies to all other attaches in all other countries, and I think it is an excellent amendment.
Charles Skelton: “It not only makes the law consistent with the rest of the statutes regarding the qualifications for an attache which…”
Editor's note · Context
Opposing an amendment related to the qualifications for an attache.
Share
More from Charles Skelton
I strongly support H.R. 556, and I voted for it when it first came through House, passing by a vote of 423-0. I support the bill because it will protect the critical technologies and the critical infrastructure of this country by ensuring…
This has to be the best, most comprehensive, troop-friendly, family-friendly and readiness-friendly bill that we have ever had.
I stand before the House in support of H.R. 4166, a bill I introduced to pay tribute to the life of one of those public servants, Mr. Steven W. Allee of Stoutland, Missouri, and a rural mail carrier for the citizens of Lebanon, Missouri…
Let me assure the gentlelady that we look forward to the results of the demonstration project, and I'm always open of course to practical approaches to address the military nursing shortage.





