However, the use of nuclear bunker busters is absolutely not the way to go. It is counterproductive. Using nuclear weapons would spread deadly radiation, putting both American troops in the theater as well as local populations at risk. It would also prevent American troops from entering caves and bunkers to retrieve potentially valuable intelligence. Perhaps most significantly, the use of tactical nuclear weapons would mark a dramatic change in United States policy and would undermine our nonproliferation policies around the globe. This is a very needed and a very necessary amendment to proceed on the non- nuclear proliferation effort.
Charles Skelton: “However, the use of nuclear bunker busters is absolutely not the way to go. It is counterproductive. Using nuclear…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing concerns about the use of nuclear bunker busters in military strategy.
Share
More from Charles Skelton
I think back lo those many years ago to a time when I was prosecuting attorney of Lafayette County and had the opportunity to witness our sheriff, deputy sheriff or Missouri Highway Patrol interrogating people who were suspects of various…
We're talking about the amendment in front of us. That's what I think people should read. Not something else. Not something that is not on point in the middle of the discussion before us today. Read it. It takes money from the personnel…
I was sorely distressed when I learned of the fact that there were a good number of former military officers that were given special access, many of whom had conflicts of interest in various defense businesses, and they were considered…
I stand before the House in support of H.R. 4166, a bill I introduced to pay tribute to the life of one of those public servants, Mr. Steven W. Allee of Stoutland, Missouri, and a rural mail carrier for the citizens of Lebanon, Missouri…





