You can appreciate where we don't want to build municipal water projects, but we want to help the Navy.
I continue to be concerned about the use of Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) contracts for specialized gear.
what specific risks are the Marine Corps taking by having a total force less than the optimal force of 186,000?
What is the Marine Corps' requirement for amphibious warships?
Without a major change in national strategy to account for a smaller force with reduced capability, the Army will likely experience a period...
it seems to me very important that we stay on track to continue building the two Virginia-class submarines a year.
We're not going to be the first one to go down that path.
We cannot do that lightly.
I'm really appreciative that you're looking at this acceleration, given the need that we know is very apparent.
So that one has been delayed, and it has been delayed from 2015 to 2018.
Is 34 the right number of amphibious vessels?