Mark Meadows

He thinks Mike deserves it. He doesn't think they're doing anything wrong.

He doesn't want to do anything, Pat.

So there's no there there.

Mr. President, everybody is on the line. This is Mark Meadows, the chief of staff.

It`s more important that we continue to fight the fight on election integrity. Regardless of who the candidate is, it`s very important that it becomes easy to vote but hard to cheat.

Do you realize how inaccurate the voter rolls are which just people just moving around? But when you look at North Carolina and ballot harvesting like happen there and it was fraudulent. Well, we`ve got states that actually are doing…

This is a fight of good versus evil.

What we are looking at is the kind of material -- we are talking about what was flushed down a toilet.

Yes, have a team have on it.

We can't lose the entire White House Counsel's Office. I do not see January 6 happening the way he is being told.

This is about Donald Trump and about actually going after him once again.

President Trump wanted to make sure that the people that came, that there was a safe environment for that kind of assembly.

Congress has just added a big piece of business for their calendar for tomorrow. At 9:00 a.m., the Rules Committee in the House is going to meet to take up this resolution recommending that Trump White House chief of staff Mark Meadows be…

Mark Meadows had to make a decision: Do I try to protect Donald Trump and the legions of people that he is convinced of this big lie, or do I stand for the institution that I was part of? Do I stand for the character and integrity that I…

This is not about me, holding me in contempt. It’s not even about making the Capitol safer. We see that by some of the selective leaks that are going on right now. This is about Donald Trump and about actually going after him once again…

If we look at, at senior officials, chiefs of staff and those senior to the president to the United States, compelling them to come in and testify and what we`re seeing now, there`s lots of jurisprudence and at least legal opinions and law…

POTUS wants to chat with Republicans about that.

I favor this resolution to proceed with criminal contempt.

Meadows's last-minute suit is plainly a tactic to delay and obstruct our investigation.

If we have no legitimate legislative purpose in investigating a violent insurrection against our own Government, well, then, we simply have no legitimate legislative purposes at all.

This level of conduct, paired with the failure to even feign an interest in transparency, is reprehensible.

The president has claimed executive privilege. I`m going to honor that. I`m not going to be the first chief of staff to actually waive that. It`s not mine to waive.

I`m not aware of anybody in the West Wing that had any advance knowledge that the security was going to be breached at the Capitol.

They`ve been pretty aggressive about holding people in contempt and, you know, they`ll do what they need to do.

In addition, we found that, in spite of our cooperation and sharing documents with them, they had issued, unbeknownst to us and not without even a courtesy call, issued a subpoena to a third-party carrier trying to get information.