Claire McCaskill

Would you let the Committee know when the field offices have all been informed, not to use the break-even analysis and not to advise that someone retroactively--not to suggest that someone should retroactively claim for a lump sum?

It is staggering that so many Americans do not even realize that this is a decision at all.

There just does not seem to be a sense of urgency.

This cannot be a hard thing to program in. You know how old she is.

We have, right here, on the source for someone who is retiring, on your web page, a sentence that is flatly false.

That should be on----

You can make excuses and disagree, you can say, 'We will think about it,' or you can say, 'You know, thanks. You are right. We are going to change this.'

I cannot imagine that that is not the most frequently asked question, because it is one that everybody--I am--you know, I will be honest here.

We hope that SSA will finally see it is in all of our interests to make sure that the public... should be one of their very top priorities.

It is outrageous that it says that on this website, because it is simply not true.

I think part of the problem is that we are all wanting the Social Security Administration to say, 'We can do this better.'

Tell people that if you make it to 65, odds are you are going to live 20 more years.

One out of three agents... suggested a claimant retire earlier and get a lump-sum payment. Acceptable?

Why don't you say '62, 66, 70'? Is there a reason? I mean, is there a good reason?

Do you believe that the main reason people are not waiting is lack of knowledge or lack of resources?

Now nobody is worse than the Pentagon. On your worst day, Ms. Reno, you will never be as bad as the Pentagon, because the Pentagon is at the apex of wasteful spending on IT acquisition.

The way we have labeled these things are really, really unfortunate.

I find it ironic that financial experts say this but the American public is clueless that this decision is so important.

How much more? Eight percent a year. Eight percent a year. That is a very attractive return in today's market.

I do not get the reluctance of the Social Security Administration. For years, bipartisan groups have been asking you to give more data.

The percentage of people who claim at 62 has declined over the last 15 years.

We have had three bipartisan commissions telling you the same thing, and you have just been taking a look.

I swear, I am going to raise a ruckus about this until this website gets fixed.

The disappearing of defined benefits is paying a huge penalty on so many Americans and Social Security is all they have got.

At the end of the day, what's motivating people to use bots is just money.