With an increasing number of female veterans, the VA must expand its care and services to meet their needs.
Tim Walz
The Public Record
Tim Walz is an American politician serving as the 41st governor of Minnesota since January 2019. A member of the Democratic Party, he previously represented Minnesota's 1st congressional district in the U.S. House of Representatives from 2007 to 2019. During his time in Congress, Walz focused on issues such as veterans' affairs, education, and healthcare, advocating for policies that support working families and rural communities.
The model of the Veterans Administration basically comes straight from Abraham Lincoln's second inaugural.
I urge my colleagues to support this measure so we can pass it quickly into law and start addressing an issue that all of us know happens all too often.
While there is no bill that will completely end veteran suicide, this comprehensive bipartisan measure is a step in the right direction.
This bill is what you get when you have folks sitting around a table, trusting one another and working to get it right for our Nation's veterans.
H.R. 5059 is the Clay Hunt Suicide Prevention for American Veterans Act. It is an example of how we get things right on Capitol Hill.
Instead of presuming to know what is best for Veterans, we should simply ask them, don't you think?
My bill H.R. 4977 the Creating Options for Veterans Expedited Recovery Act, COVER we call it, will help remedy this tragic problem.
I am embarrassed that they are grateful to me because that veteran should have been able to do that on their own.
We just have to make sure that, as we put regulations in place, they mesh with what are the best practices.
It is an economic issue. It impacts everything from water quality to the farmers' bottom lines.
I never understood as a military person myself why there was no equivalent of the quadrennial defense review?
The situation in Phoenix and elsewhere that provided even one veteran substandard care is simply unacceptable.
I think this is the thing, and we have heard it before, I mean it is hard to fathom that this kind of stuff happens or the pettiness that goes on.
I believe this IR has regulatory effect and that this effect may serve to dis-incentivize the very practices we are hoping to promote.
I am concerned with the process by which this interpretive rule was effectively finalized.
Our goal is clean water, and that is best achieved by focusing more on facilitating compliance and less on punitive enforcement mechanisms.
I and jointly with Ranking Member Tim Bishop have written a letter to the House Appropriations Committee requesting their support in directing EPA resources towards pilot projects.





