As good corporate citizens, they must also explain why this is a good deal for consumers.
We need more investment in telecommunications, investment in infrastructure, in customer service, and in new technologies.
This sounds to me like a broken promise, an example of consumers being forced into expensive bundles that they do not necessarily want.
Municipal broadband is a way for small towns to take control of their economic destiny.
To me that is not a good reason to approve a deal.
Many of my constituents want this option, and my view is that you should be offering it whether the deal is approved or not.
This is blatantly anti-consumer, and I think it violates local government rights.
I've seen it, the resilience of the people of Minnesota and what you see every time you go to these things is Minnesotans helping other Minn...
I just don't think we are doing right by our original citizens.
I want American Indian kids having that dream.
I find that incredibly disappointing.