Most economists that appeared before our Committee on the Budget agreed that increasing taxes is not the way to balance the budget if we want to stimulate job growth in this country. And as everybody knows, or should know, 2 years ago in 1993, what this Congress did with the different majority is they increased taxes a record $252 billion over the 5 years of that budget. Our conference met and decided that if we wanted to stimulate job growth and savings and cap investment in this country, then we should offset that $252 billion tax increase with some kind of tax decrease. That is what we did. This tax decrease is totally paid for out of spending cuts and it is going to stimulate the economy.
Nick Smith: “Most economists that appeared before our Committee on the Budget agreed that increasing taxes is not the way to balance…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing tax policy and its impact on job growth during a budget committee meeting.
Share
More from Nick Smith
Reclaiming my time, although I support the intention of the chairman of the Committee on Small Business, my concern would be where the money comes from. So, in the MEP program, it is already sacrificing, and this also takes funds out of…
How do we change? How do we develop the kind of discipline, intestinal fortitude to start slowing down this huge growth of government to the extent that we have decided we will simply borrow more and more money to take home to our…
I oppose H.R. 2828, the California Water Bill because it preauthorizes wasteful projects. It forces federal taxpayers to pick up more than a $1.5 billion tab for a California-only project. It would not prevent taxpayers from getting stuck…
I wore my Adam Smith tie this morning because today we are going to talk about some ways that might help us give discipline to ourselves on how much money we spend and how much overpromising we do. Two areas. One, I am from a farm in…





