I oppose H.R. 2828, the California Water Bill because it preauthorizes wasteful projects. It forces federal taxpayers to pick up more than a $1.5 billion tab for a California-only project. It would not prevent taxpayers from getting stuck with the cost for large water projects, and would open the Federal treasury to raids by disingenuous water users. H.R. 2828 would "preauthorize" major water projects. A "yes" vote on H.R. 2828 would mean Congress gives up its long-standing right to have a say over taxpayer funded projects. Why should the rest of the country pay for California's water problem? They have 35 million taxpayers to pay for it.
Nick Smith: “I oppose H.R. 2828, the California Water Bill because it preauthorizes wasteful projects. It forces federal taxpayers to…”
Editor's note · Context
Opposing H.R. 2828, the California Water Bill, during a House floor debate.
Share
More from Nick Smith
The debt is $7 trillion divided by about 290 million. It comes out to almost $25,000 for every man, woman and child in terms of their share of the debt.
I think it is appropriate to mention the only reason this really came to the forefront and has become an issue is because the Election Assistance Commission Chairman, DeForest Soaries, proposed a possibility of a policy for allowing the…
Well, Mr. Chairman, let me just say that this is cut from one of the largest expenditures in the United Nations appropriations, that is, to the contributions to international organizations. I think the American taxpayer in general is not…
Reclaiming my time, although I support the intention of the chairman of the Committee on Small Business, my concern would be where the money comes from. So, in the MEP program, it is already sacrificing, and this also takes funds out of…





