I oppose H.R. 2828, the California Water Bill because it preauthorizes wasteful projects. It forces federal taxpayers to pick up more than a $1.5 billion tab for a California-only project. It would not prevent taxpayers from getting stuck with the cost for large water projects, and would open the Federal treasury to raids by disingenuous water users. H.R. 2828 would "preauthorize" major water projects. A "yes" vote on H.R. 2828 would mean Congress gives up its long-standing right to have a say over taxpayer funded projects. Why should the rest of the country pay for California's water problem? They have 35 million taxpayers to pay for it.
Editor's note · Context
Opposing H.R. 2828, the California Water Bill, during a House floor debate.
Share
More from Nick Smith
I would suggest this kind of partisan language would not be appropriate in any legislation. I assume the goal of the gentleman from California (Mr. Waxman) is not to politicize science and research, yet I respectfully suggest that is what…
I am an outside member because my Subcommittee on Research on the Committee on Science overseas the U.S. Fire Administration, and this legislation reauthorizes the Fire Grant program. By the end of this year, we will have 25,000 fire…
Well, Mr. Chairman, let me just say that this is cut from one of the largest expenditures in the United Nations appropriations, that is, to the contributions to international organizations. I think the American taxpayer in general is not…
I would like to address certainly different issues that I think are possibly more serious than a lot of challenges this Congress has faced, this Nation has faced in fact. This is the 195th birthday of Abraham Lincoln, and in my district…





