If we say that all of the other taxpayers of the United States should contribute to help solve this problem, then it seems reasonable that all of the needs that are going to be considered for environmental cleanup be considered with the available money and it be decided how much goes to each one of those needed projects. For this body now to bypass the Committee on Appropriations, to bypass the analysis of how do we best spend our environmental money is not consistent with the way Congress should operate. It should go through the scrutiny of appropriations. It should go through the scrutiny of the hearings process. It should not be passed as an amendment on this floor to obligate the taxpayers across the whole country to pay for this particular cleanup of the Everglades in Florida.
Nick Smith: “If we say that all of the other taxpayers of the United States should contribute to help solve this problem, then it…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing concerns about an amendment related to environmental cleanup funding during Senate debate.
Share
More from Nick Smith
I oppose H.R. 2828, the California Water Bill because it preauthorizes wasteful projects. It forces federal taxpayers to pick up more than a $1.5 billion tab for a California-only project. It would not prevent taxpayers from getting stuck…
The reason we are here is to make clear to the world that we are not going to have military conscription right now for active military duty. I introduced a bill last year, H.R. 3598, because I think we need to seriously discuss the…
The debt is $7 trillion divided by about 290 million. It comes out to almost $25,000 for every man, woman and child in terms of their share of the debt.
How do we change? How do we develop the kind of discipline, intestinal fortitude to start slowing down this huge growth of government to the extent that we have decided we will simply borrow more and more money to take home to our…





