I just want to suggest that some of us agree with the President in where it is appropriate to have the Sea Grant Program administered. I just would like to reinforce for our future consideration the possibility and the logic of having this under the National Science Foundation because research is so important as part of the Sea Grant Program as we most effectively and efficiently move ahead with this issue. It is especially important to the State of Michigan, and I am sure the gentleman from Michigan (Mr. Ehlers) will counsel with NSF as we proceed under his jurisdiction for Sea Grant. But as we look at next year and the year after, I think it is important that we acknowledge what the administration has suggested in the most appropriate place for the jurisdiction of this program.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the administration of the Sea Grant Program and its potential alignment with the National Science Foundation.
Share
More from Nick Smith
reclaiming my time, although I support the intention of the chairman of the Committee on Small Business, my concern would be where the money comes from. So, in the MEP program, it is already sacrificing, and this also takes funds out of…
I am an outside member because my Subcommittee on Research on the Committee on Science overseas the U.S. Fire Administration, and this legislation reauthorizes the Fire Grant program. By the end of this year, we will have 25,000 fire…
the challenge is unending, and one thing I am nervous about in terms of Washington sometime in the future is paying the Social Security benefits, the Medicare and Medicaid benefits that we have promised, because what we have done over the…
I share with my colleagues a poem by Albert Carey Caswell. And to This End And to this end Approach Heaven, our True American Hero . . . America's finest of all true friends Rest now . . . our Great American Patriot . . . as up to Heaven…





