The increased tax on Social Security benefits passed in 1993 was for the purpose of reducing deficit spending, even though the money of the tax was earmarked for Medicare. As far as its justification for deficit reduction, it is appropriate that we repeal this tax increase. We are now experiencing huge surpluses and make up that money to Medicare. Therefore, to continue to justify this tax for deficit reduction is not appropriate. Let me offer another reason why it is appropriate to reduce this tax. Higher-income retirees tend to be workers who paid in more Social Security taxes than lower-wage earners; and because the Social Security system is so progressive, higher-income wage earners already receive a much smaller percentage of what they paid in terms of the benefits they receive. It is not fair in a relative sense that they be additionally penalized by this tax. Now, it is my opinion that eventually, as we lower the tax rate overall, as suggested by Governor Bush, we should tax Social Security benefits the way we tax private pensions.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the appropriateness of repealing the tax on Social Security benefits during a floor speech.
Share
More from Nick Smith
I oppose H.R. 2828, the California Water Bill because it preauthorizes wasteful projects. It forces federal taxpayers to pick up more than a $1.5 billion tab for a California-only project. It would not prevent taxpayers from getting stuck…
If it says that the $20 million is going to be withheld unless and until there is full cooperation by the United Nations and participating countries releasing available information on the Oil-for-Food program?
the challenge is unending, and one thing I am nervous about in terms of Washington sometime in the future is paying the Social Security benefits, the Medicare and Medicaid benefits that we have promised, because what we have done over the…
I think it was in The Music Man where the seller of that musical equipment says, ``We have big trouble right here in River City.'' We have big troubles here in Washington, D.C., and in America, for a couple of reasons. The competition from…





