Gilbert and Sullivan once said in one of their operas ``Things are seldom what they seem.'' We have been talking a lot about the protests, and that maybe the tax cuts are unfairly divided between rich and poor. I think it is important that we remind ourselves what is in this legislation. In this legislation what we are going to be voting on is $100 billion of spending cuts. That is $23 billion out of discarding needless bureaucracy, $24 billion cut in the area of eliminating duplication and waste, $10,900,000,000 cut from foreign aid, $7,500,000,000 attacking corporate welfare, $22 billion in setting empowerment, and an $11 billion spending cut. Also what this bill does, it says none of these tax reductions take effect until we cut an estimated another $400 billion in spending and get on that glide path toward a balanced budget, which is our goal.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of proposed tax cuts and spending cuts in legislation.
Share
More from Nick Smith
I would just like to speak about what some consider boring statistics on government growth. I can add later in this 5-minute short brief, on where we are on not only overspending but over-promising. We are now doing the appropriations…
I think it would be good for history's sake to look at the last time that we dramatically increased taxes. We did that; when President Clinton came into office, we had the largest tax increase in history, and what was the effect of that on…
I rise to make the point that under the current law, there are no limits for government price support payments to farmers using commodity certificates. If commodity certificates and loan forfeitures would have been included under the…
I oppose H.R. 2828, the California Water Bill because it preauthorizes wasteful projects. It forces federal taxpayers to pick up more than a $1.5 billion tab for a California-only project. It would not prevent taxpayers from getting stuck…





