I would like to correct the gentleman from Arkansas when he states that this proposal limits the participation of retired farmers or retired farmers' spouses or widows of retired farmers. The Senate proposal provides exemptions. For example, retired farmers and widows of farmers can have their labor and management requirements met by a relative. If you have additional sons or relatives on the farm, if they are actively participating, they are also eligible for the $150,000. I think we should remind everybody that up until the last 2 years, the limit on LDPs and marketing loans was $75,000. The year before last, because prices were so low, we upped that to $150,000. We are facing a situation now where when we passed this bill through the House, unfortunately, in the bill we passed through the House it was stated that there were limits on commodity loan payments, marketing loan payments. Technically that is true, but it is not totally honest, as I pointed out, because there was a loophole, and the loophole was the ability of farmers to use certificates and forfeitures.
Editor's note · Context
Addressing misconceptions about a proposal related to retired farmers and loan payment limits.
Share
More from Nick Smith
I think it was in The Music Man where the seller of that musical equipment says, ``We have big trouble right here in River City.'' We have big troubles here in Washington, D.C., and in America, for a couple of reasons. The competition from…
people say that a truly great athlete is not only gifted himself, he makes those who play with him better. The same is true of President Reagan, who not only led the country, but restored America's confidence. He renewed our sense of…
you know, we are certainly in the campaign season of an election year; and I think everybody, Mr. Speaker, needs to be on guard for the talent to spin. And I am reminded of a cartoon that was in our paper recently. And there were four…
I oppose H.R. 2828, the California Water Bill because it preauthorizes wasteful projects. It forces federal taxpayers to pick up more than a $1.5 billion tab for a California-only project. It would not prevent taxpayers from getting stuck…





