I would like to explain a few things for those people across the Nation who are watching this debate. We will hear a lot of numbers being batted back and forth in this Chamber today. We will hear terms like baselines, out years, budget authority, allocations, sequesters and CBO scoring. But don't be fooled. We're not talking about quantum physics here. This debate is really about power--the power of government versus the power of the American people. On the one hand, we have the Democrats' budget. It relies on the same tired formula they have peddled for years: more social spending; more careless defense cuts; more big deficits. Equally as interesting is what's not in their budget: no health care reform; no welfare reform; and no tough crime bill. Taken together, this visionless document is the very essence of status quo. It continues to feed the same failed Government policies with the personal and financial freedom of America's middle-class families. In stark contrast, we Republicans have offered an alternative called putting families first. This comprehensive package provides tax relief for families, incentives for job creation, greater deficit reduction, and funding for welfare reform, health care reform and a tough, comprehensive crime bill--all paid for with meaningful spending cuts. In short, the Republican alternative is a blueprint for the future, that invests in people not government.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the differences between the Democratic and Republican budget proposals.
Share
More from Joseph Knollenberg
many of my colleagues would have the American people believe that a government-run, Big Brother-like health care delivery system is not only necessary, but rather a must. This ill-informed argument is almost always supported by the word…
first, I would like to convey my deepest sympathies to the victims of the California earthquake. We in Congress have witnessed your plight and I hope we can send relief in a timely manner. Second, we should pay for disaster relief with…
yesterday's survey results on the public's faith in President Clinton's foreign policy skills were no surprise to me and my colleagues. We have known for some time that our country's once unquestioned role as leader of the free world is…
I want to conclude my comments by again applauding Congressman Zeliff and Congressman Inhofe for their spark, for their enthusiasm and for really architecting the possibilities that we have in front of us. And tomorrow is a big day. We do…





