Political Quotes

Joseph Knollenberg: first, I would like to convey my deepest sympathies to the victims of the California earthquake. We in Congress have…

On the recordFebruary 1, 1994
first, I would like to convey my deepest sympathies to the victims of the California earthquake. We in Congress have witnessed your plight and I hope we can send relief in a timely manner. Second, we should pay for disaster relief with spending cuts, rather than adding to the Federal deficit. We owe that to the people of California and we owe that to the taxpayers of America. Finally, we have to view the quake for what it is: A clarion call for a smart and equitable disaster policy. We simply cannot continue to wait until catastrophe strikes, and then haphazardly address the aftermath with a mish-mash of Government programs. In the past 10 years, this visionless policy has cost us $22 billion. We need to consider legislation like H.R. 2873, the Natural Disaster Protection Act, introduced by Congressman Norm Mineta. This initiative would speed up basic relief when it is needed. It would give every American living in a disaster-prone area access to a sound and affordable system of insurance. And it would limit the taxpayers' liability to the costs of disaster relief and recovery. The Federal Government will never be able to avert natural disasters, but let us at least be ready for them when they happen.
Said by
Joseph Knollenberg
Republican · Michigan

Editor's note · Context

The speaker addresses disaster relief and policy in response to the California earthquake.

Share

More from Joseph Knollenberg

Jun 14, 2006

I now yield the remaining time in my allotment to the gentleman from Florida (Mr. Mica).

govinfo.gov
Jun 13, 2006

HOPE VI was intended to demolish 100,000 units of severely distressed public housing units, and the program has accomplished that goal. However, there is currently $80 million in unobligated funds going back as far as 10 years-plus. And…

govinfo.gov
Jun 30, 2005

I insist on my point of order, and I would like to respond in this fashion. I raise a point of order against the amendment. The amendment proposes to increase an appropriation not authorized by law and, therefore, is in violation of clause…

govinfo.gov
Jun 14, 2006

If you withdraw the amendment, I am prepared to work with you any way that I can, but the amendment would have to be withdrawn, so I am just asking for a guarantee that the amendment will be withdrawn.

govinfo.gov

Other voices in this conversation