as a member of the oversight delegation that attended the negotiations over the U.N. treaty on climate change, I am absolutely outraged by U.N. official Raul Estrada's comments about congressional opposition to the overreaching Kyoto Accord. As I mentioned yesterday, Mr. Estrada and the rest of the world need to understand that, as representatives of the United States, our first obligation is to protect America's interests. The Kyoto treaty places the entire burden of reducing greenhouse gas emissions on developed nations and most particularly the United States, while giving developing nations like China, India, Mexico and Brazil a free pass. This would impose unrealistic burdens on the American people and significantly lower the standard of living of our country. Make no mistake about it, if this treaty goes through, we will lose jobs and our citizens will pay more for goods and services. Mr. Speaker, while the rest of the world may have an interest in seeing America's economy suffer, we do not. I urge my colleagues to remain firm in their opposition to the Kyoto treaty on climate change.
Joseph Knollenberg: “as a member of the oversight delegation that attended the negotiations over the U.N. treaty on climate change, I am…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing opposition to the Kyoto Accord during a discussion on climate change treaty negotiations.
Share
More from Joseph Knollenberg
I am pleased to say that I will support the conference report. The conference report has much to commend. We meet the majority of the transportation funding guarantee as mandated by SAFETEA-LU, plus included some wise legislative…
I am happy to respond. I share your concerns. And I thank my colleague for raising this very important issue today. He correctly points out that the bill includes $227 million for HIDTA, the High Intensity Drug Trafficking Areas program…
I have no speakers left, but I reserve the right to close, so I want to continue to reserve my time.
at the end of the day, this creates an entitlement for vacant units. These funds are for tenant protection, not unit protection. I yield back the balance of my time. The Acting CHAIRMAN. The question is on the amendment offered by the…





