Throughout the VA/HUD appropriations hearings this year, I have had occasion to engage both EPA Administrator Carol Browner and Assistant Administrator for Air and Radiation Bob Perciasepe in a dialogue about their legal troubles and their faulty standards and their flips and their reversals and their scientific troubles. In light of all that, let me explain a little personal experience we are having with EPA in Michigan. The EPA implemented national restrictive mandates on air using a 1-hour measurement. Then EPA revoked the 1-hour measurement and switched to an 8-hour measurement. Next the courts explained to EPA that their actions were unconstitutional. Then the EPA flipped back again to the first restrictive mandate. As my colleagues can imagine, the States and the regulated community are frustrated and harmed by EPA's failures. Now the EPA is ignoring the most recent air quality data and is instead relying on old, out-of-date designations that were in place at the time the 1-hour measurement was revoked the first time. Now, if my colleagues are lost, so were we and so are we. Now, this bad action by EPA violates the long-standing legal principle of fairness known as 'detrimental reliance.' We can do a whole lot better than this.
Joseph Knollenberg: “Throughout the VA/HUD appropriations hearings this year, I have had occasion to engage both EPA Administrator Carol…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing issues with the EPA's air quality standards and their impact on Michigan during appropriations hearings.
Share
More from Joseph Knollenberg
Mr. Speaker, I rise to provide some perspective on the effect H.R. 1851 will have on discretionary spending and on the appropriations process. If we're not careful, we will be opening the door to a huge new spending at uncontrollable…
pardon me, but what is the time allotment on the other side and here? The CHAIRMAN. The gentleman from Vermont (Mr. Sanders) has 30 seconds remaining and the gentleman from Michigan (Mr. Knollenberg) 3\1/2\ minutes remaining.
likewise, I urge everyone to support this bill. It is a good bill. I yield back the balance of my time. The SPEAKER pro tempore (Mr. Hastings of Washington). Without objection, the previous question is ordered on the conference report…
the bill before us fully funds the renewal of Section 8 vouchers. Additional funds, especially ones at the expense of critical programs, are simply not necessary. The cost of Section 8 vouchers are remaining constant and in some markets…





